Strutt & Parker vs Knight Frank: which is better? Comparison 2026
By our public methodology Strutt & Parker scores 76 out of 100 and Knight Frank scores 75. Below: the factors and facts where they differ, each fact with its source.
Score breakdown
| Strutt & Parker | Knight Frank | |
|---|---|---|
| Licence and legal entity | 100 | 100 |
| Client protection | 60 | 60 |
| Transparency | 50 | 75 |
| Experience | 68 | 41 |
Pros and cons
Strutt & Parker
- Meets its country's licence or register requirement
- Names its legal entity and registration number
- Money held for clients is protected
- Long track record as an agency
Knight Frank
- Meets its country's licence or register requirement
- Names its legal entity and registration number
- Publishes its fees
- Money held for clients is protected
Facts side by side
| Fact | Strutt & Parker | Knight Frank |
|---|---|---|
| Licence or register | Yes struttandparker.com | Yes knightfrank.co.uk |
| Redress scheme | Property Redress Scheme struttandparker.com | Property Redress Scheme knightfrank.co.uk |
| Legal entity on the website | Yes struttandparker.com | Yes knightfrank.com |
| Client money protection | Yes realestate.bnpparibas.co.uk | Yes knightfrank.co.uk |
| Member of a professional body | Yes struttandparker.com | Yes knightfrank.co.uk |
| Fees published | Not verified | Yes knightfrank.co.uk |
| Complaints procedure | Yes struttandparker.com | Not verified |
| Listings on its own website | Yes struttandparker.com | Yes knightfrank.co.uk |
| In business since | 1885 struttandparker.com | 1896 knightfrank.co.uk |
| Offices (stated by the agency) | 50 struttandparker.com | Not verified |
| App Store rating | Not verified | 3.2★ itunes.apple.com |
| App Store ratings | Not verified | 20 itunes.apple.com |