ING Leasing vs EFL: which is better? Comparison 2026
By our public methodology ING Leasing and EFL score the same — 68 out of 100. Below: where they differ by factor and by fact.
Score breakdown
| ING Leasing | EFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Terms | 95 | 79 |
| Access | 60 | 60 |
| Reliability | 33 | 100 |
| Transparency | 75 | 0 |
Pros and cons
ING Leasing
- Low down payment
- Long term — lower monthly payments
- Part of a banking group
- Rates and total cost are published openly
EFL
- Low down payment
- Long track record as a licensed lessor
- Long term — lower monthly payments
- Part of a banking group
Facts side by side
| Fact | ING Leasing | EFL |
|---|---|---|
| Licensed / registered as a lessor since | Not verified | 1991 efl.pl |
| Minimum down payment | 0% ingleasing.pl | 0% efl.pl |
| Maximum contract term | 84 mo ingleasing.pl | 84 mo efl.pl |
| Leasing for businesses | Yes ingleasing.pl | Yes efl.pl |
| Used cars | Yes ingleasing.pl | Yes efl.pl |
| Early repayment | Yes ingleasing.pl | Not verified |
| Decision on application | 24 h ingleasing.pl | 24 h efl.pl |
| Part of a banking group | Yes ingleasing.pl | Yes efl.pl |
| Regional offices | Not verified | 27 efl.pl |
| Rates published online | Yes ingleasing.pl | Not verified |
| Online application | Yes ingleasing.pl | Not verified |