Вира-АртСтрой vs ГК «Фундамент»: which is better? Comparison 2026
By our public methodology Вира-АртСтрой scores 80 out of 100 and ГК «Фундамент» scores 76. Below: the factors and facts where they differ, each fact with its source.
Score breakdown
| Вира-АртСтрой | ГК «Фундамент» | |
|---|---|---|
| Contract and guarantee | 80 | 100 |
| Legal entity and insurance | 100 | 38 |
| Transparency | 100 | 100 |
| Experience | 50 | 45 |
| Service | 33 | 100 |
Pros and cons
Вира-АртСтрой
- Written contract or fixed estimate stated
- Prices published on the site
- Legal entity with registry number given
- Works or liability insurance stated
ГК «Фундамент»
- Long guarantee on work stated
- Written contract or fixed estimate stated
- Prices published on the site
- Works or liability insurance stated
Facts side by side
| Fact | Вира-АртСтрой | ГК «Фундамент» |
|---|---|---|
| Guarantee on work | 36 mo eremont.ru | 60 mo remont-f.ru |
| Written contract or fixed estimate | Yes eremont.ru | Yes remont-f.ru |
| Legal entity with registry number | Yes eremont.ru | Not verified |
| Works or liability insurance | Yes eremont.ru | Yes remont-f.ru |
| Trade body | Yes eremont.ru | Not verified |
| Prices published | Yes eremont.ru | Yes remont-f.ru |
| Portfolio of work | Yes eremont.ru | Yes remont-f.ru |
| Year founded | 1996 eremont.ru | 1999 remont-f.ru |
| Complaints procedure | Not verified | Yes remont-f.ru |
| Contact channels (of 4) | 4 eremont.ru | 4 remont-f.ru |