Hodge Jones & Allen vs Russell-Cooke: which is better? Comparison 2026

By our public methodology Hodge Jones & Allen scores 89 out of 100 and Russell-Cooke scores 77. Below: the factors and facts where they differ, each fact with its source.

Law firms in the United Kingdom 2026: a ranking based on facts How we rank

1

Hodge Jones & Allen

89/100
2

Russell-Cooke

77/100

Score breakdown

Hodge Jones & AllenRussell-Cooke
Status and entity100100
Client protection7538
Transparency100100
Experience and reach7463

Pros and cons

Hodge Jones & Allen

  • Bar status, chamber membership or licence shown
  • Fee schedule or principles published
  • Legal entity with registration number stated
  • Professional liability insurance declared

Russell-Cooke

  • Bar status, chamber membership or licence shown
  • Fee schedule or principles published
  • Legal entity with registration number stated
  • Long established

Facts side by side

FactHodge Jones & AllenRussell-Cooke
Bar, chamber or licenceYes hja.netYes russell-cooke.co.uk
Legal entity with registration numberYes hja.netYes russell-cooke.co.uk
Professional liability insuranceYes hja.netNot verified
Where to complainYes hja.netYes russell-cooke.co.uk
Privacy policyYes hja.netYes russell-cooke.co.uk
Fee schedule or principlesYes hja.netYes russell-cooke.co.uk
Contact channels (of 4)4 hja.net4 russell-cooke.co.uk
Year founded1977 hja.net1880 russell-cooke.co.uk
Lawyers (stated)90 hja.net250 russell-cooke.co.uk
Working languages24 hja.netNot verified

← Lawyers and law firms